School Budget Passes: 1520 to 1444
by Judy Silberstein
(May 18, 2004; updated May 19) When Board President Bob Martin
walked into the room full of PTA presidents, school board
members,
and
other
school
supporters at around 9:30 this evening, the look of relief
on his face telegraphed the results on his notepad. The
votes
were
1509 “yes"
to 1440 “no” – a difference of 69 votes.
Though there are a few more affidavit votes to be counted,
there are not enough to influence the outcome of the vote.
The final tally ended up as 1520 to 1444. The $89.5 million
budget passed, despite efforts of those opposed to the
inclusion
of $500,000
towards a project that
will reconfigure
the Kemper Memorial to make room for a varsity-sized sports
field.
Official Vote: Updated on May 19
| Budget: YES: 1520 |
NO: 1444 |
TOTAL: 2960 |
School Board: Cecilia Absher: 2167
|
Janet Buchbinder:
2103 |
Mr. Martin congratulated
Cecilia Absher on her re-election and Janet Buchbinder on
her election to the school board;
the two ran unopposed, as did all candidates for the Selection
Committee. (See: Selection
Committee Candidates) He
then
acknowledged
the extra
work done by the budget supporters this year, and
said “We
think this is the very best decision for the students.”
Voter Turnout for Selection Committee Election
Central
Total=74 |
Chatsworth
Total=120 |
Mamk. Ave
Total=44 |
Murray
Total=85 | Total
Total=323 |
Voter turnout was considerably
larger for the budget this year than last (2949 vs 2084)
and the result was much closer. Last year’s
budget passed by close to a 2 to 1 margin (1371 to 713).
In 2002, turnout was even smaller (only 1701), but the margin
was also 2 to 1 in favor of the budget. Voting for Selection
Committee membership was down: a total of 323 this year compared
with 419 last year.
Superintendent Sherry King emphasized the positive. “Many,
many more people came out to vote yes,” she noted.
However, she stressed that “the board will be reaching
out to those who have another view. Clearly there are other
sentiments in the community."
One of those who clearly had other sentiments was Richard
Cantor, a member of the Kemper family who has been strenuously
opposed to the school board’s plans for moving the
memorial and altering the park. “That’s pretty
terrific that the vote is so close,” he observed when
apprised of the vote result. “Usually it’s a
slam dunk,” he said and stated that with the vote so
close he would like for there to be a recount.
He added, “It doesn’t change anything; we’re
still going to do everything to protect the park.”
Stephen Kling, a Larchmont resident who had written a letter
in support of the board plan, voiced his view. “It’s
good that a minor issue didn’t stop the school budget
from passing,” he said.
His son, Sam, one of the Mamaroneck High School students
who had been working with the effort to defeat the budget,
had a different view. “I’m happy that the budget
passed, so the schools will get funded, but I’m not
happy that they’re going to move the Kemper Memorial."
“I’m disappointed that the budget passed. I’m
heartened that it’s so close,” said
Fred Baron, who has been serving as spokesperson for the
group opposing the inclusion of the Kemper project in the
budget. He expressed hope that the school board would reconsider
its plans in light of the close vote and the need to include
more funds for the project in next year’s budget. “Clearly
this shows how divided the community is over the Kemper issue,” he
emphasized.
Whether they were relieved or disappointed with the budget
vote, all parties recognized the issue
of the Kemper Memorial will take some time to resolve.
|