|
VOL Opens Hearing on Public Dining; Hears Flint Park Concerns
Also: Appreciation & Clarification on New Year's Fire
by Judy Silberstein
(January 9, 2008) Larchmont’s business district –
beautiful and otherwise – continued to receive attention from the
Village Board on Monday, January 7, the first public meeting of the new
year. The board opened a public hearing on proposed modifications to its
outdoor dining law aimed at curbing encroachment onto the sidewalks by
some restaurants and their patrons. The board also heard from neighbors
of Flint Park, who raised questions about the ongoing construction of
the fields and environmental area.

Sidewalk Dining:
More Laws or More Enforcement?
As yet, the board has not settled on actual language for
a new ordinance, so the discussion focused more on concept than details.
“The vast number of restaurants contribute positively to the ambiance,”
said Trustee Richard Ward, who has been assessing the existing rules,
but “there have been cases when the permitted use of the street
has been abused.” Many restaurant owners do not seem to have read
the law, he said, citing for example the use of plastic furniture, which
is expressly prohibited. Others are using far more space on the sidewalk
than is allowed.
On a more positive note, Mayor Feld reported that she and
Police Chief Steve Rubeo had met successfully with restaurant owners following
the last board meeting, in which residents had raised noise complaints.
(See:VOL Looking to
Tame Restaurant Noise & Sidewalk Dining. )
Other board members felt enforcement – and the lack
of self-enforcement – are significant issues. If one establishment
oversteps the bounds without consequences, others feel “Why shouldn’t
we too,” said Mr. Ward.
He suggested the following areas for possible change: considering
an applicant’s previous conduct when it is time to approve a new
permit for outdoor dining; having the police department rather than the
building department responsible for enforcement; and adding fines for
infractions.
Trustee Marlene Kolbert stressed having provisions that
were enforceable – and did not focus on overly technical issues,
such as the exact number of inches between the curb and the furniture.
She said many complaints to the board are about noise, which is not even
addressed in the current law.
Trustee Anne McAndrews noted “several of these establishments
have become places to congregate.” The problem has more to do with
late-night drinking than with sidewalk dining, she suggested.
Asked for her advice, Larchmont’s assistant attorney,
Joanna Feldman, said the board should distinguish between behavior of
people eating outside and noise made by people leaving the establishment
late at night – talking loudly and slamming car doors, for example.
Ms. McAndrews raised two other issues not currently covered:
barriers around outdoor tables and signs attached to the barriers. The
Board of Architectural Review, which regulates business signage on buildings,
appears not to have control of barrier signs, she said.
Mayor Feld raised the related problem of easels and sandwich
boards in the middle of sidewalks. “Quite frankly, it’s tacky,”
she said.
“People want the outdoor dining – and don’t
want a police state,” summarized Mayor Feld. “It’s a
balance.”
The board will continue the discussion and the public hearing
at its next meeting, on January 28, when it anticipates having draft language
for the revised ordinance.
Neighbors Concerned About New Poles & New Paths at
Flint Park
With construction underway at Flint Park, residents on
adjoining streets have been startled by the size of poles and netting
erected at the baseball field behind their homes. They were also surprised
to find new walking paths being constructed only a few feet from their
back yards.
Vicky and Zach Stein, residents of Old Colony Drive, presented
the board with a letter of concern signed by neighbors from 15 adjacent
properties.

“Many of the residents have lived in this area for
over 20 years,” read the letter, “and few of us have ever
had a problem with the lively soccer or baseball games that go on in the
field behind our homes. Now with the erection of very high poles and its
attached black netting, the park has created an unnecessary eyesore.”
Other concerns included increased traffic and parking along their narrow
streets.
Mayor Feld and Trustee Jim Millstein were able to allay
some fears and answer a number of questions: Yes, there would there be
plantings to screen neighboring yards. No, there would not be night lights
at the ball fields (the inter-municipal agreement with Town of Mamaroneck
excludes them). Yes, there had been requisite environmental studies, and
because of newly raised concerns the board is talking about “going
to another level” of study, said the mayor. No, there would not
be a new entrance into the park from the dead end at Lindsey Road. And
yes, the paths were accessible to the handicapped.
As for the poles and nets, they had been an “add alternate”
in the approved plan and had been recommended by the Little League to
protect visitors to the new environmental area, which until recently served
as a leaf composting area off-limits to the public. Yes, they can be removed,
said the mayor.
“We all agree they are unsightly,” said Mayor
Feld, but she counseled waiting to see how the view shapes up once new
landscaping and other elements are in place.
Because many of the residents signing the letter had not
participated in (or been aware) of the many planning meetings and discussions
on the park’s development, the mayor suggested the board meet with
them this week to answer remaining questions.

Front
Page
Print This Page
Email this page
|